Civil War Scout
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Civil War FAQs >
      • What Caused the Civil War?
    • Primary Documents
  • Scouting Reports
    • Shiloh National Military Park
  • Intelligence Reports
    • Elementary Readers
    • Middle School Readers
    • Mature Readers
    • Scholars
  • Contact

Not A Monolith--The Civil War as More Than North vs. South

1/2/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
The states of the Union and Confederacy (with slaveholding Union border states in yellow)
Over the past several years the discussion about Confederate memory has been in the headlines, especially in regards to monuments. Discussions have taken place on college campuses, in high school board meetings, and at museums. Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and Nathan Bedford Forrest have all taken a figurative, if not literal, tumble from their pedestals. I've heard a lot of varied opinions, and (because I can't help myself, even though I should) Facebook and Yahoo comments about the appropriateness of the moves by local communities to “rewrite” the history of their public spaces. Often one of the most common responses I hear goes something like what I had as dinner conversation with a former business professor at a state university in Oregon, when he was discussing what he knew about his ancestors who had fought in the Civil War:

“My grandfather who fought for the south, for Virginia, did it because he considered Virginia his country, like everyone did back then.”

He voices a popular, if inaccurate, absolute: in the 1860s the state was paramount and people were more attached to their state than the concept of a federal government. The next logical step, then is that men and women of the time had no choice, that their fate was inexorably tied to the fate of their states. Whether intentional or not, what that statement does is separate the people from their decisions, making the onus for their support of the Confederacy someone else’s problem—namely the state legislators and secession delegates who voted to leave the Union. If there are no decisions to make, a person can't be judged.

The myth that everyone just followed their state allows us to draw a clean line of demarcation between North and South and color large swaths of the map blue and grey. But if you've learned nothing from Civil War Scout in this last couple of years, I hope you can take this away...there is nothing simple about the Civil War.

Men and women of the time did have choices…even the Confederacy’s most venerated generals. Robert E. Lee could have chosen to stay loyal to the Union.  Historian Allen Guelzo makes an argument that his choice to follow Virginia was at least party driven by the desire to retain as much of his children’s birthright in the form of Arlington as he could (The Decision, Civil War Monitor, Volume 8, Issue 2). Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson was born in the western counties of Virginia, that believing their voices were not heard in the secession vote, threw in with the Union and created the state of West Virginia.

To say that it all was fate based on where a person was born or where they lived minimizes those who chose differently and suffered great personal consequences.​
PictureUnion General George Thomas was born into a slaveholding family in Virginia.
​George Thomas was born a Virginian into a slaveholding family and when he stayed loyal to the Union his family disowned him. He rose to become one of the western army’s most reliable generals, and earned the nickname “Rock of Chickamauga” for his actions at that same battle that beat back the Confederate army’s attempt to overrun the retreating Union army. Even after the war, his family refused to speak to him ever again.

​Clement Vallandigham was born in Ohio. His rhetoric against the Lincoln administration was so severe Union General Ambrose Burnside arrested him. Eventually he was released and sent across the lines into the Confederacy from where he went to Canada and became the Democratic nominee for Governor of Ohio in 1863. He ran his campaign from Canada, and lost in a landslide.

Make no mistake, the men and women who chose to go against their state were often going against their family, friends and neighbors. It was not an easy row to hoe. But it illustrates another oft echoed phrase of the Civil War…it was indeed brother versus brother.
Picture
Ohioan Clement Vallandigham was banished to the Confederacy.
​Look for more information about George Thomas, Clement Vallandigham and others who went against their state in a new series called Not a Monolith which will appear periodically on this blog.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Toni is a wife, mom and history buff who loves bringing the Civil War to life for family members of all ages.

    Archives

    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016

    Categories

    All
    Black History Month
    Book Review
    Bull Run
    Causes
    Chancellorsville
    Charleston
    Children
    Confederate
    Courage
    Death
    Ellwood
    Fort Sumter
    Franklin
    Fredericksburg
    General History
    Gettysburg
    Hunley
    Kids Book
    Letters
    Manassas
    Medicine
    Monuments
    Murfreesboro
    Music
    Navies
    New Market
    Shiloh
    Slavery
    Soldiers
    Spies
    States-rights65a8dce77a
    Stones-river
    Stonewall-jackson
    Technology
    Travel
    Union
    Wilderness
    Women's History Month

    RSS Feed

© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Civil War FAQs >
      • What Caused the Civil War?
    • Primary Documents
  • Scouting Reports
    • Shiloh National Military Park
  • Intelligence Reports
    • Elementary Readers
    • Middle School Readers
    • Mature Readers
    • Scholars
  • Contact